Vyomerc Consultancy · Proprietary Platform
TUSM
Unified Security Management Engine
A purpose-built, proprietary risk platform that quantifies every exposure as a USD loss magnitude, enforces CIS hardening continuously, and remediates configuration drift the moment it occurs — all within a completely air-gapped, sovereign architecture your data never leaves.
100%
Offline Capable
FAIR
Risk Quantification
CIS v8
Benchmark Validated
0
External Dependencies
<6s
Mean Remediation Time
Platform Overview
Security measured in
financial consequence.
TUSM was built in response to a fundamental failure in how the industry handles enterprise risk. For too long, security teams have operated on abstract severity scores — CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM — that tell a board nothing actionable about the actual cost of a breach or the financial priority of remediation.
The platform operates across three integrated layers: Attack Surface Reduction, Automated Remediation, and Risk Governance. These layers are orchestrated by the TUSM Core Engine — a continuous command plane that scans, validates, remediates, and quantifies across every connected asset simultaneously, without requiring manual intervention at any point in the cycle.
Everything runs inside your perimeter. No telemetry leaves the environment. No vendor cloud. No external API calls. TUSM operates in complete network isolation by design — not as a compliance posture, but as an architectural guarantee backed by its Docker-native, dependency-free deployment model.
Risk Governance
FAIR Quantification · Board Reporting · Audit Trail
Automated Remediation
Config Drift Correction · Policy Enforcement · Patching
Attack Surface Reduction
Asset Discovery · CIS Validation · Threat Surface Mapping
TUSM Engine
Unified Command Plane · Air-Gapped · Zero Egress
Risk quantified as financial consequence,
not severity scores.
Most security platforms deliver a list of vulnerabilities ranked CRITICAL, HIGH, or MEDIUM — and then stop. They leave the organisation to figure out which finding matters most, what it would actually cost if exploited, and how to explain that to the board in language that drives a funding decision.
TUSM takes a fundamentally different position. Severity ratings are irrelevant without knowing a vulnerability's position in the total asset network, the financial value of what it puts at risk, and the probability distribution of exploitation. The platform begins by building Total Inventory Context — mapping every interconnected asset, dependency chain, and exposure path before a single risk number is calculated.
From that foundation, TUSM applies the Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) framework to model the probable financial loss from every exposure. The output is not a threat score. It is a precise USD loss magnitude with loss exceedance probability curves — the kind of language a CFO, a risk committee, or a board can act on directly. The result is a complete transformation of how remediation is prioritised: not "patch the CRITICAL findings" but "address the $2.4M authentication exposure before the $340K perimeter issue."
Output Format
$2,400,000
Probable annual loss — expressed in exact USD at the 90th percentile, not an abstract risk rating.
// Environment: [ENTERPRISE_REDACTED] · Assets catalogued: 847
Every asset. Every layer. No blind spots.
// Deviation on GCP workloads: S3 bucket ACL misconfiguration · CIS 3.3
// Remediation protocol queued: bucket-acl-hardening-v2
The most dangerous gaps in enterprise security are not in the tools organisations have — they are in the environments those tools cannot see. Hypervisors running KVM, VMware, and ESXi beneath the monitored layer. Cloud workloads that drift from their hardened baseline between scan cycles. Edge firewalls that receive a rule change that no SIEM captures. TUSM was built specifically to eliminate these visibility blind spots.
The platform unifies telemetry across the full hybrid stack — on-premises servers, cloud workloads, virtualisation infrastructure, endpoints, and edge firewalls — into a single operational baseline. This is not log aggregation. It is continuous state validation: every asset's configuration is compared against its CIS Benchmark hardening profile on an ongoing basis, and any deviation from that baseline triggers an immediate response.
The AI-powered deviation engine accelerates this validation layer, using local machine learning models — running entirely within the air-gapped environment — to identify deviations with greater precision than signature-based rules alone. The result is a hardening baseline that does not degrade over time, regardless of how rapidly the environment grows or changes.
Detect, enforce, verify. In under six seconds.
The most common failure mode in enterprise security is not the absence of detection — it is the gap between detection and response. A SIEM fires an alert. A ticket is created. An analyst reviews it the next morning. A manager approves the change window. A technician applies the fix on Thursday. For six days, the misconfiguration sat open. TUSM eliminates this cycle entirely by collapsing detection and remediation into a single automated loop with a mean response time measured in seconds, not days.
When the TUSM engine detects a deviation — a configuration change, a policy violation, a drift from the approved CIS baseline — it does not create a ticket. It immediately selects the appropriate remediation protocol from its library of hardened playbooks, validates the protocol against the specific asset's context and criticality, and deploys the fix automatically. A validation pass confirms the asset has returned to its compliant state. Every step is written to an immutable, cryptographically signed audit log.
ESXi config drift from CIS v8 L2 baseline — SSH root login re-enabled on cluster node 3.
TUSM correlates against CIS Control 5.2.10. Asset criticality: HIGH. Financial exposure delta: +$214K.
SSH hardening playbook v3.1 queued for deployment across 4 affected hosts in the cluster.
Remediation protocol applied. SSH root access disabled. Configuration locked to baseline.
4/4 hosts restored to compliant state. Audit entry written — tamper-evident, cryptographically signed.
Your data never leaves your environment.
Every cloud-connected security platform creates an invisible third party in your security model: the vendor. Your vulnerability data, your architecture maps, your asset inventories, and your risk posture all flow through their infrastructure. For most organisations, this is an accepted trade-off. For environments handling classified data, legal professional privilege, financial records, or regulated personal information — it is unacceptable.
TUSM was architected from first principles for complete network isolation. The platform is fully containerised via Docker, requiring no proprietary hardware and no vendor-controlled cloud services. The AI analysis engine runs on local large language models — inside the perimeter — without any external API calls. Every function TUSM performs operates within the boundary you control, permanently.
This is not a compliance posture or a marketing claim. It is an architectural guarantee that can be verified by your team: no network routes out of the environment exist, no telemetry is transmitted, and no external dependencies are required for any operational function.
No data transmitted outside the perimeter — by architecture, not policy.
Fully containerised. Self-hostable on any infrastructure you control.
AI analysis powered by on-premises LLMs. No OpenAI. No external inference.
No external APIs, vendor cloud services, or runtime dependencies required.
Built for the entire audit chain.
Security platforms are typically designed for one audience: the internal security team. TUSM was designed for three: the internal team, the external auditor, and the MSSP delivering the service. This distinction shapes everything from how evidence is packaged to how multi-tenancy is handled at the portfolio level.
For auditors, TUSM eliminates the preparation burden that makes compliance reviews expensive and time-consuming. The platform continuously generates standardised evidence artefacts aligned to CIS Controls v8, NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 Type II — structured for submission, not post-hoc assembly. When an auditor requests evidence of hardening compliance, the package already exists, complete with timestamps, cryptographic integrity verification, and chain-of-custody metadata.
For MSSPs, TUSM provides the quantified risk foundation that transforms client engagements. Rather than delivering generic vulnerability reports, MSSP teams can provide clients with FAIR-modelled financial exposure analysis, continuous CIS compliance dashboards, and automated remediation assurance — all backed by the sovereign architecture clients in regulated sectors require. The platform integrates cleanly into multi-tenancy service delivery workflows, enabling portfolio-level risk visibility without cross-contaminating client data.
// Generated: 2026-05-25 · Framework: CIS Controls v8 + NIST 800-53 Rev5
// Evidence integrity: SHA-256 verified · Tamper-evident
// Chain of custody: complete · Audit trail: immutable
// Package ready for third-party auditor submission
Deployment Advisory
Deploy TUSM inside your environment.
Our engineering team scopes, deploys, and validates TUSM against your specific infrastructure — on-premises, air-gapped, or hybrid. No cloud dependencies introduced. No data leaves your perimeter. Fully operational within days.
[SOVEREIGN_ARCHITECTURE // CIAAAN_ALIGNED // ZERO_EGRESS]